Highlighting Bioethics Education, CBMH FK-KMK UGM Conducts HELP Course Series 6 Course, HELP Course

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH FK-KMK UGM) has successfully completed its regular HELP Course (Humanity–Ethics–Legal–Professionalism) Series 6, Batch 5, carrying the main theme “HELP Aspects in Medical Education.” The program was conducted over eight sessions, held from 30 August to 22 September 2022.

Delivered in a fully virtual format, the course was attended by participants from various backgrounds, including healthcare practitioners and professionals involved in medical education institutions. The diversity of participants enriched discussions and reflected the growing need for structured bioethics education across healthcare and academic settings.

As the organizing institution, CBMH FK-KMK UGM curated a range of essential topics in bioethics education. These included the fundamentals of teaching bioethics, strategies for bioethics instruction, assessment methods in bioethics education, development of teaching materials, and key ethical issues in higher education.

In addition to theoretical sessions, the course also featured two dedicated practical sessions, allowing participants to directly apply the knowledge and concepts they had acquired throughout the program.

Through the implementation of the HELP Course Series 6, CBMH FK-KMK UGM reaffirmed its commitment to strengthening capacity in bioethics education and supporting the development of educators and practitioners who are ethically grounded, professionally competent, and responsive to the evolving challenges of medical education.

Editor : Rafi

Building Patient Safety Through Effective Communication in Healthcare Services

/0 Comments/in , , /by

komunikasi failure

Yogyakarta, 15 October 2025 — Communication is a fundamental pillar of healthcare services. In clinical practice, clinics, and hospitals, the quality of interactions between healthcare professionals, patients, and their families often determines the outcomes of care. Yet, communication is also one of the most frequently overlooked sources of risk. Communication failure can lead to misunderstandings, delays in treatment, and even fatal medical incidents.

Recognizing the urgency of this issue, the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH), Universitas Gadjah Mada, once again organized its weekly Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing on Wednesday, 15 October 2025. Conducted online via Zoom Meeting, the session carried the theme “Communication Failure” and featured dr. Rukmono Siswishanto, M.Kes., SpOG(K) as the main speaker.

In his presentation, dr. Rukmono emphasized that communication lies at the heart of healthcare delivery, as all processes—from consultation and decision-making to medical interventions—depend on accurate information exchange. However, evidence shows that communication failure is a leading cause of sentinel events, defined as unexpected incidents that result in serious patient injury or death.

Communication failures may arise from multiple factors, including unclear message content, misunderstanding of the audience, inappropriate timing, or misaligned communication objectives. Misunderstandings often stem from differences in perspectives, language, and background among those involved. Additional barriers such as assumptions, emotional responses, stress, and fatigue further hinder the effective delivery and reception of information.

Medical consultation was highlighted as the core communication process in healthcare services. Beyond information transfer, consultations must uphold key ethical principles, including beneficence (prioritizing patient well-being), respect for autonomy (honoring patients’ rights to be informed and to make decisions), justice (ensuring fair access to care), and truth-telling (transparency regarding information and conflicts of interest).

International data indicate that the number of sentinel events continues to increase annually. Many of these incidents involve delayed treatment, wrong-site surgery, retained foreign objects after procedures, and patient suicide—most of which could be prevented through effective and systematic communication among healthcare professionals.

According to dr. Rukmono, the most common forms of communication failure include insufficient or untimely information provided to patients, lack of information sharing among colleagues, poor listening skills, and failure to involve family members or caregivers in decision-making processes. Contributing factors range from individual conditions of healthcare workers and heavy workloads to unstructured communication systems and weak interprofessional collaboration.

As solutions, healthcare professionals are encouraged to improve communication at both personal and systemic levels. Recommended measures include strengthening empathy, managing stress, improving medical documentation, refining team communication workflows, and understanding patients’ backgrounds and needs. Structured communication approaches such as SBAR (Situation–Background–Assessment–Recommendation), read-back, and team briefings were recommended to minimize errors and clarify instructions.

At the conclusion of the session, dr. Rukmono underscored that effective communication is the foundation of patient safety. Improving communication systems must become part of the institutional culture in healthcare settings, and clinical communication training should be integrated from medical education through professional practice.

These efforts align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. By strengthening communication in healthcare services, medical professionals not only enhance service quality but also contribute meaningfully to the development of a safer, more equitable, and sustainable healthcare system.

Reporter: Ardhini N, M.K.M.
Editor: Rafi

Ethical Dilemmas Behind Neuroenhancement Technology and Brain Modification

/0 Comments/in , , /by

BIOETIKA HUMANIORA MEDICAL ETHICS

Yogyakarta, 12 September 2025 — Rapid advancements in neuroscience technology over recent years have presented both significant opportunities and profound challenges for the fields of healthcare and education. Innovations such as neuroenhancement—the enhancement of human brain function beyond normal conditions—not only promise new medical solutions but also raise critical questions concerning justice, safety, and ethical use.

In response to the urgency of these issues, the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH), Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FK-KMK UGM), held its weekly RABOAN academic forum on Wednesday, 10 September 2025. This regular forum serves as an interdisciplinary platform for discussing contemporary issues in bioethics.

The theme of this session was “Neuroenhancement and Brain Modification: Ethical Aspects in the Use of Cognitive Enhancement Technologies.” The main speaker, Dr. dr. Taufiq Fredrik Pasiak, M.Kes., M.Pd.I., MH., CIPA, delivered a comprehensive presentation on the development of neuroscience technologies and their accompanying ethical implications. The discussion was moderated by Mahmasoni Masdar, S.Kep., Ns., M.Kep.

During the session, Dr. Taufiq explained that neuroenhancement refers to the use of technology to improve human cognitive brain functions beyond their normal state. Current examples include non-invasive brain stimulation, concentration-enhancing pharmaceuticals, and the potential for brain modification through advanced technological interventions.

According to him, these technological developments offer significant opportunities in education, healthcare, and workplace productivity. For instance, cognitive enhancement technologies may assist patients with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, or support individuals with learning difficulties in adapting more effectively.

Nevertheless, he emphasized that such innovations are inseparable from serious ethical concerns, including:

  • Justice and accessibility — whether these technologies will be accessible only to financially privileged groups, thereby widening existing inequalities.

  • Long-term safety — the lack of extensive research on long-term effects raises concerns about potential new health risks.

  • Privacy and individual freedom — technologies capable of influencing brain function provoke fundamental questions regarding the protection of human rights.

  • The need for regulation — the importance of developing policy frameworks involving multidisciplinary perspectives, from medicine to law, to ensure ethical governance of these technologies.

Dr. Taufiq also highlighted the concept of neurorights, referring to fundamental rights that must be safeguarded in the era of neuroscience innovation. These include the right to personal identity, freedom of thought, mental privacy, and protection against discrimination based on cognitive capacity.

This issue is closely linked to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being. Cognitive enhancement technologies hold potential to support brain health and improve quality of life, especially in the prevention and treatment of neurological and mental disorders. Neuroenhancement may also contribute to the rehabilitation of patients with impaired brain function, enabling them to return to productive daily activities. However, without appropriate regulation, such technologies risk generating new health problems, including dependency, misuse, or unknown long-term effects.

By addressing the topic of neuroenhancement, CBMH UGM demonstrates its commitment to ethical reflection amid rapid technological innovation. It is hoped that this discussion will serve as a starting point for further research, policy development, and regulatory frameworks that can balance technological benefits with the protection of fundamental human values.

Reporter: Ardhini N, M.K.M.
Editor: Rafi

 

Integrating Business Ethics and Medical Ethics in Obstetrics & Gynecology Practice

/0 Comments/in , /by

BIOETIKA HUMANIORA MEDICAL ETHICS

A mother arrives at a hospital with the hope of receiving the best possible care for herself and her baby. Yet behind every medical decision made by physicians, there are often additional considerations—ranging from financial pressures and insurance policies to hospital revenue targets. How can doctors maintain professional integrity while the healthcare business must continue to operate? This critical question became the central focus of the Raboan Discussion Forum, organized by the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH), Universitas Gadjah Mada, on Wednesday, 27 August 2025, from 13:00 to 14:30 WIB.

Carrying the theme “Integrating Business Ethics and Medical Ethics in Obstetrics & Gynecology Practice,” the forum featured Prof. Dr. dr. Rajuddin, SpOG(K), Subsp. FER as the main speaker, with NS Wahyu Dewi Sulistyarini, M.S.N. serving as moderator.

In his presentation, Prof. Rajuddin emphasized the importance of achieving a balance between medical ethics and business ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology practice. Issues such as overtreatment driven by financial targets, patient discrimination based on socioeconomic status, and the risk of commercialization in fertility services were highlighted as tangible examples of ethical dilemmas frequently encountered in clinical settings.

Furthermore, he underlined that well-implemented business ethics can, in fact, reinforce medical ethics. Cross-subsidy schemes, for instance, may help ensure equitable access to healthcare for underprivileged patients, while profits generated from premium services can be allocated to improving facilities, supporting research, and enhancing the training of healthcare professionals.

The discussion was also closely linked to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. By integrating business and medical ethics, healthcare systems are expected to deliver services that are sustainable, equitable, and dignified, while simultaneously strengthening public trust in healthcare institutions.

The event received a strong and enthusiastic response, with participants joining from a wide range of institutions, including hospitals, educational institutions, and health organizations across Indonesia. The diversity of participants enriched the discussion, bringing interdisciplinary perspectives that further underscored the relevance of this topic to everyday healthcare practice.

Through this regular forum, CBMH UGM reaffirms its commitment to fostering critical and solution-oriented discussions on bioethics and the medical humanities, in support of more just, high-quality, and sustainable healthcare services in Indonesia.

Watch the full discussion on the CBMH UGM YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WImScaUqbO4

Reporter: Rafi

Academic Excellence, but Where Is Empathy? Rethinking Medical School Admissions

/0 Comments/in , /by

raboan bioetika

Yogyakarta, 6 August 2025 — The quality of a nation’s healthcare system is strongly determined by the quality of its medical workforce, particularly physicians who stand at the frontline of healthcare delivery. Behind every competent doctor lies a selection process that determines who is granted the opportunity to pursue medical education. Amid the growing demand for healthcare professionals who possess not only academic excellence but also strong integrity and empathy, a fundamental question arises: does the current medical school admissions system in Indonesia adequately respond to the needs of today’s healthcare landscape?

This strategic issue became the focus of the Raboan Discussion Forum, held on Wednesday, 6 August 2025, under the theme “Medical School Admissions: Are We on the Right Track?” The forum featured dr. Hikmah Muktamiroh, MMedEd, SpKKLP, Subsp COPC, who delivered a comprehensive overview of the dynamics of medical student selection in Indonesia, compared it with practices in developed countries, and proposed innovative pathways for reform.

In her presentation, dr. Hikmah emphasized that medical school admissions in Indonesia remain heavily focused on cognitive and academic performance, with insufficient assessment of ethical values and empathy. This imbalance risks producing graduates who excel academically but may lack adequate readiness to navigate the complex human relationships inherent in clinical practice.

She also highlighted several critical challenges, including unequal access for students from 3T regions (Tertinggal, Terdepan, and Terluar – underdeveloped, frontier, and remote areas), the commercialization of medical education, and the absence of a national standard for non-academic assessment. As a comparison, dr. Hikmah discussed admission practices in countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, where selection processes have incorporated Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI), personality assessments, and evaluations of empathy and communication skills.

Towards the end of the session, several policy reform proposals were presented, including strengthening soft skills assessment, providing affirmative pathways for students from 3T regions, enhancing training for faculty interviewers, and involving professional organizations as well as bioethics experts in designing a fairer and future-oriented admissions system.

This topic is highly relevant within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being, SDG 4: Quality Education, and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. Reforming medical education admissions to be more inclusive, ethical, and equitable is a crucial foundation for ensuring that all citizens—without exception—have access to high-quality healthcare delivered by competent and principled medical professionals.

Reporter: Rafi 
Editor: Alvira

Learning History: A Crucial Foundation for an Ethical and Sustainable Future

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Yogyakarta, 16 July 2025 – In a rapidly changing world, studying history is not just about remembering the past, but also about understanding the direction of our future. History offers us essential lessons—particularly in ethics, justice, and humanity. The principle of “Jas Merah” (an Indonesian acronym for “Never Forget History”) is especially relevant to this edition of Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing, which raised the theme “Ethical Considerations in Historical Research: Locating Archives and Conducting Interviews.” This session featured Professor Hans Pols from the University of Sydney and was moderated by Ns. Wahyu Dewi Sulistyarini, M.S.N., from CBMH UGM.

Prof. Hans emphasized that history is no longer solely told from the perspective of those in power or from elite narratives. Today, it also serves as a space to amplify voices that have long been marginalized—such as those of women, laborers, and ethnic minorities—offering us a broader and more just understanding of the past.

He also highlighted the vital role of archives as key sources of information about past events and figures. However, working with archives also presents ethical challenges. For example, colonial-era Dutch newspapers archived on Delpher.nl contain rich data but are written in Dutch and largely reflect a colonial viewpoint. This makes it all the more important to balance such sources with materials that represent diverse Indonesian perspectives, including oral histories that are more inclusive and sensitive to cultural and social diversity.

According to Prof. Hans, ethics in historical writing means having the courage to explore stories that are unusual, overlooked, or hidden within the “silences” of history. It also means ensuring that history—through books, journals, and digital databases—can be accessed by everyone, regardless of background or academic privilege.

This topic closely aligns with several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 4: Quality Education, by promoting a critical and inclusive understanding of the past, SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities, by highlighting stories from marginalized communities, SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, by uncovering the roots of injustice and fostering transparent, equitable governance.

By learning from the successes and failures of the past—whether in managing resources, fostering social development, or upholding justice—we can craft wiser, more ethical, and more inclusive pathways for the future. A future that values not only progress but also fairness, diversity, and shared humanity.

Reporter: Ika Setyasari, S.Kep.Ns., M.N.Sc

Editor: Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

[easy_youtube_gallery id=RdRt8uXzkK8 cols=1 ar=16_9 thumbnail=0 title=top]”Ethical Considerations in Historical Research: Locating Archives and Conducting Interviews”[/easy_youtube_gallery]

Care Without Distance: Opportunities and Challenges of Telemedicine After the New Health Law

/0 Comments/in , , /by

The Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH) at Universitas Gadjah Mada held another session of its weekly forum, Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing, on Wednesday, July 9, 2025. The discussion was conducted virtually via Zoom and explored a timely and important topic: “Telemedicine After the Enactment of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health.” The session featured Dr. Febriyolla SK Sjaawalz, MH, CIIQA, lecturer at the Faculty of Medicine, UPN Veteran Jakarta, as the main speaker, and was moderated by NS Wahyu Dewi Sulistyarini, M.S.N.

In her presentation, Dr. Febriyolla explained how digital technology has significantly transformed the way healthcare services are delivered. One key example is telemedicine—remote healthcare services that use communication technologies. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, as both patients and healthcare providers needed a safe way to access and provide medical care during lockdowns and social restrictions.

Following the enactment of Law No. 17 of 2023, telemedicine in Indonesia now has a clearer legal foundation. This law officially recognizes telemedicine as part of the national health service system. It also mandates that telemedicine must be provided by licensed healthcare professionals through accredited healthcare facilities. Additionally, the law highlights the importance of maintaining high-quality service standards and ensuring the security and confidentiality of patient data.

During the session, participants were invited to explore the benefits of telemedicine, such as broader access to healthcare—especially for people in remote areas—and more efficient use of time and cost. However, Dr. Febriyolla also pointed out several challenges, including limited digital infrastructure, concerns about the accuracy of remote diagnoses, and the risks of data privacy breaches.

From both legal and ethical perspectives, telemedicine must still comply with existing regulations. Informed consent remains essential, and medical records must be securely stored. If malpractice or ethical violations occur, legal enforcement mechanisms continue to apply, just as they would in traditional clinical settings.

The topic closely aligns with several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Telemedicine has the potential to reduce health disparities by providing more equitable access to care, even in hard-to-reach regions.

Through this Raboan event, CBMH UGM reaffirms its commitment to fostering interdisciplinary discussions that not only contribute to academic discourse but also address real-world issues that impact communities. Telemedicine is not just a technological tool—it represents a major shift in how we understand and provide healthcare in ways that are inclusive, secure, and just.

Reporter: Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

Editor: Rafi Khairuna Wibisono, S.Kom.

[easy_youtube_gallery id=Bw1BkI_ePdU cols=1 ar=16_9 thumbnail=0 title=top]TELEMEDISIN PASCA UU NOMOR 17/2023 TENTANG KESEHATAN[/easy_youtube_gallery]

Hundreds of Ethnicities, Hundreds of Values: Exploring Indonesia’s Indigenous Bioethics

/0 Comments/in , , /by

The Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH), Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FK-KMK UGM), held its regular Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing Forum on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. This session featured a compelling and timely topic: “Ethno-Bioethics for Indonesia”, with Prof. Dr. Heddy Shri Ahimsa-Putra, M.A., M.Phil., Professor of Anthropology at UGM’s Faculty of Cultural Sciences, as the keynote speaker. The discussion was moderated by Mahmasoni Masdar, S.Kep., Ns., M.Kep. from CBMH FK-KMK UGM.

In his presentation, Prof. Heddy emphasized that the development of global bioethics is still largely influenced by Western paradigms, which prioritize principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. While these principles are important, they may not align directly with the diverse cultural values, social structures, and worldviews of the Indonesian people. He called on scholars and policymakers to consider more contextual and culturally grounded approaches to bioethics. To that end, he introduced the concept of “Ethno-Bioethics”, an approach rooted in local cultural values, indigenous knowledge systems (ethnoscience), and traditional ethical frameworks held by Indonesia’s many ethnic groups.

“Indonesia is not a single nation but a collection of hundreds of ethnic groups, each with their own ways of understanding life, health, birth, and death,” Prof. Heddy stated.

He explained that over 600 ethnic groups in Indonesia possess distinct ethical systems and traditional knowledge related to life and health. Unfortunately, much of this wisdom remains undocumented, passed down only through oral traditions, and has yet to be integrated into academic discourse or national health policy. As examples, he cited the Javanese principle of kerukunan (harmony) and the Balinese teachings on the welfare of all living beings, both of which reflect universal bioethical values.

Prof. Heddy highlighted the urgency of conducting ethnographic research across Indonesia to collect, document, and revitalize these local ethical frameworks. He proposed the formulation of a distinctive “Indonesian Bioethics” or even a “Pancasila Bioethics” as Indonesia’s unique contribution to the global bioethics dialogue. He also encouraged UGM—through CBMH—to become a national pioneer in bioethics education, documentation, and advocacy that is culturally inclusive, contextually relevant, and rooted in justice.

This Raboan discussion aligns closely with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It supports SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) by promoting culturally appropriate and widely accepted ethical approaches in healthcare. It also advances SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by amplifying the voices and ethical knowledge of marginalized ethnic communities often overlooked in national policies. Furthermore, the call for interdisciplinary collaboration and ethnographic research fosters partnerships in line with SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals).

In closing, Prof. Heddy called for the national academic community to seriously pursue ethnographic bioethics research across regions and cultures to shape an inclusive, pluralistic, and culturally just bioethics framework—one that truly reflects the soul of Indonesia.

Reporter: Ardhini Nugrahaeni, M.K.M.

Editor: Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

[easy_youtube_gallery id=0SBn4cNGgew cols=1 ar=16_9 thumbnail=0 title=top]Etnobioetika: Bioetika untuk/di Indonesia[/easy_youtube_gallery]

Bridging the Gap: Uncovering Health Inequities and Moving Forward

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Yogyakarta, June 18, 2025 – Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing returned with a highly relevant and thought-provoking topic: “Ethics in the Distribution of Catastrophic Health Services under BPJS.”

This session featured expert speaker Prof. dr. Laksono Trisnantoro, M.Sc., Ph.D., Professor at the Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing (FMPHN), Universitas Gadjah Mada. The discussion was moderated by Mahmasoni Masdar, S.Kep., Ns., M.Kep from CBMH UGM. Together, they explored the pressing issue of inequality in access to healthcare services across Indonesia.

Drawing from BPJS data from 2015 to 2023, Prof. Laksono presented how advanced medical procedures such as cardiac catheterization (Cathlab) remain concentrated in Java and Bali. In contrast, eastern regions like Papua and Maluku are significantly underserved. This disparity raises an ethical concern, as all BPJS members—regardless of their backgrounds—deserve equal access to life-saving health services.

Prof. Laksono also introduced ethical frameworks based on Pareto efficiency and Rawlsian justice in public policy, prompting reflection with questions such as: Is it justifiable that only a portion of the population benefits from state-of-the-art healthcare, while others lack even basic referral access? Is it ethical to allow a system to continue operating without addressing deeply rooted structural inequalities? As stated in the Pareto principle:

“A policy is considered good if at least one group becomes better off, without making others worse off.”

Raboan session was highly interactive, with participants from various professional backgrounds calling for true implementation of equity and social solidarity within the National Health Insurance (JKN) system.

This theme strongly aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. Equal access to catastrophic health services is not merely about equipment or budgets—it is a matter of dignity and justice for all Indonesian citizens.

This Raboan discussion reaffirmed that equitable access to healthcare is not merely a matter of infrastructure and funding, but a question of justice and human dignity. It is hoped that this forum will serve as a concrete impetus for policymakers to build a more just, inclusive, and people-centered health system for all Indonesians.

 

[easy_youtube_gallery id=Iqs3kioSJR4 cols=1 ar=16_9 thumbnail=0 title=top]Etika dalam Pemerataan Pelayanan Kesehatan Katastropik BPJS[/easy_youtube_gallery]

“Posted First, Fired Later?” Learning from Healthcare Workers’ Social Media Cases: Ethics, Reputation, and Hospital Marketing

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Yogyakarta, June 11, 2025 – The weekly Raboan Research and Perspective Sharing returned with a timely and relevant topic for the digital age: “Posted First, Fired Later? Learning from Healthcare Workers’ Social Media Cases: Ethics, Reputation, and Hospital Marketing.” The event was held online via Zoom, featuring dr. Jodi Visnu, MPH, a Health-Marketing Strategist, as the main speaker. The session was attended by a diverse audience, including healthcare workers, academics, hospital health promotion staff, and social media content creators. There was high engagement and active discussion, showing that this issue is a growing concern for both the healthcare world and the digital public.

Dr. Jodi explained how healthcare professionals today are not just caregivers, but also institutional influencers—meaning their social media posts can directly impact the reputation and public image of the hospitals they represent. Cases of viral content from medical staff leading to ethical controversies and even termination reveal a lack of proper digital communication policies in many health institutions.

He emphasized that while hospitals are encouraged to be more open and educational online, it’s important to differentiate between content that’s informative and helpful versus content made just to go viral. Ethics should not limit creativity—but guide it—ensuring responsible communication that respects others and doesn’t harm, especially patients. Dr. Jodi also highlighted the importance of instilling ethical awareness early in medical education and strengthening hospital policies to adapt to the digital era.

This session aligns with the spirit of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially:

  • SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being): by promoting ethical and empathetic communication in healthcare to build trust, protect patients’ rights, and support a dignified, people-centered health system.
  • SDG 4 (Quality Education): by emphasizing the need for digital literacy and early ethics training for future health professionals.

This Raboan became a meaningful space for participants to critically reflect on the role of social media in shaping public perception. It reminded everyone that social platforms are not just tools for sharing content. They also carry real consequences for public trust, institutional reputation, and professional ethics in healthcare.

Reporter          : Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

Editor              : Rafi Khairuna Wibisono, S.Kom.

[easy_youtube_gallery id=LReyJKcOpFI cols=1 ar=16_9 thumbnail=0 title=top]Learning from Healthcare Workers’ Social Media Cases: Ethics, Reputation, and Hospital Marketing[/easy_youtube_gallery]