Tag Archive for: SDGs 3

Exploring Public Health Ethics: Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities UGM Welcomes Prof. Angus Dawson as a Visiting Professor in 2024

Group Photo of the Guest Lecture with Prof. Angus Dawson

Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities at Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) successfully held a Visiting Professor Program from November 12 to 14, 2024. The program featured Prof. Angus Dawson from the National University of Singapore (NUS) as the main speaker. The event was conducted in a hybrid format, with in-person sessions at the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing (FM-PHN) UGM, as well as online via Zoom Meeting.

The event kicked off on November 12, 2024, with a workshop entitled “Joint Manuscript and Research/Project on Public Health Ethics.” This workshop aimed to strengthen research collaborations on public health ethics. The following day, a lunch discussion on bioethics and humanities education was held. In addition, a “Rabuan” seminar, a routine discussion series on public health topics, took place. The event was further enriched by an “exchange works/experience” session, where participants shared their insights and experiences.

The peak of the event occurred on November 14, 2024, with a Guest Lecture by Prof. Angus Dawson. This session was the most anticipated part of the event, drawing attendance from students, academics, and practitioners. Prof. Angus presented a lecture on “The Importance of Public Health,” which delved into the concepts, values, and impact of public health. In his presentation, Prof. Angus highlighted the fundamental differences between public health and clinical care. While clinical care focuses on individual patients, public health takes a community, social, and cultural approach, aiming to protect and improve health on a larger scale.

Presentation of “The Importance of Public Health” by Prof. Angus Dawson

Key takeaways from the presentation included the notion that public health is not solely about individual treatment but also about managing health risks within communities. The ethical dimensions of public health were also emphasized, given that decisions in this field often involve moral dilemmas. For example, quarantine policies for controlling infectious diseases must balance individual freedom with the protection of public health. As a result, social justice and equity in access to healthcare services become crucial principles in decision-making processes.

This Guest Lecture played a significant role in supporting several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These include SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), as it discusses patient care within the social, community, and cultural context of public health. It also relates to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), addressing efforts to reduce inequalities in access to healthcare services and outcomes within the “societal, community, cultural context.” Lastly, it supports SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) through discussions on “autonomy and confidentiality” for patients, with a focus on personal data protection and human rights in healthcare.

The interactive discussion session was a highlight of the Guest Lecture. Students, academics, and practitioners actively asked questions and shared their perspectives. Several participants appreciated the relevance and depth of the discussion. One participant stated, “This guest lecture has broadened my perspective on how public health requires not only medical knowledge but also ethical considerations and policy-making skills. It is a field where science meets society.”

Through this series of events, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities UGM reaffirmed its role in fostering ethical discussions on public health issues. This program successfully bridged academic discourse, field practice, and policy, thereby promoting research collaboration and raising public awareness of the importance of public health in sustainable development.

Reporter        : Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.
Editor             : Rafi Khairuna Wibisono, S.Kom.

Webinar Raboan Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH) UGM: Family Decision Making

Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities Universitas Gadjah Mada (CBMH UGM) held its regular Raboan event with the theme “Family Decision Making” on Wednesday, October 8, 2024. The event was hosted via Zoom and featured Lintang Sagoro, MD, a master’s student from Harvard Medical School, as the speaker. The webinar was attended by students, academics, and healthcare practitioners interested in medical ethics and policy issues.

Lintang Sagoro, MD, opened the discussion by highlighting the crucial role of the family in decision-making for the care of patients with serious illnesses. “Medical decisions are not just about the therapies to be administered, but also about how to maintain the quality of life of the patient, both physically and emotionally,” he explained. Lintang Sagoro, MD emphasized that honest and transparent communication between patients, families, and healthcare providers is essential for ensuring the well-being of the patient, especially in the context of palliative care.

In the first session, Lintang Sagoro, MD discussed the importance of bioethical principles in medical decision-making, grounded in the values of Pancasila. The concepts of respect, beneficence, and justice, which advocate for the respect of all forms of life, including humans, animals, and the environment, serve as the foundation that must be considered in every medical decision. “The principle of patient autonomy must be balanced with family responsibility, and we need to ensure that decisions reflect the noble values that underpin bioethics,” he said.

The discussion then moved to the topic of palliative care, which aims to improve the quality of life for patients with serious illnesses. Lintang Sagoro, MD explained that palliative care is not meant to replace curative treatment, but rather to complement it by focusing on the comfort of the patient, as well as providing emotional and spiritual support for both the patient and their family.

Communication challenges between families and patients were also a key point of focus in this webinar. Lintang Sagoro, MD revealed that families often face dilemmas in disclosing the health condition of patients with severe illnesses, as they try to protect the patient from stress that may arise from unpleasant information. “It is important for healthcare providers to help families deliver information carefully and empathetically, so the decision-making process can proceed smoothly,” he said.

The webinar also highlighted the cultural differences in medical decision-making between Indonesia and Western countries. In Indonesia, medical decisions tend to involve the extended family, whereas in countries like the United States, patient autonomy plays a more dominant role in determining their care. This difference underscores the importance of understanding cultural context in medical practice.

The discussion was relevant to SDG 3 on Good Health and Well-Being, which emphasizes the importance of quality and inclusive healthcare. Family-based decision-making and honest communication in the care of patients with serious illnesses support efforts to achieve better access to holistic palliative care. This also contributes to reducing healthcare inequities and enhancing the well-being of both patients and families facing difficult conditions.

At the conclusion of the event, Lintang Sagoro, MD encouraged participants to better understand the importance of emotional support for families caring for patients with serious illnesses, as well as the need to integrate palliative care into the healthcare system. “Support for caregivers is crucial, as they not only care for the physical needs of the patient, but also face significant emotional challenges,” he remarked.

For more information, please visit the official of CBMH UGM

E-mail             : cbmhfkugm@ugm.ac.id

Youtube          : CBMH UGM

Instagram        : cbmh_ugm

 

Reporter          : Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

Editor              : Rafi Khairuna Wibisono, S.Kom.

Webinar RABOAN “Ethics and Moral Dilemma: Approaches For Solving Ethical Dilemmas”

Yogyakarta, October 2, 2024 – The Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH) of the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FKKMK UGM) hosted the RABOAN webinar titled “Ethics and Moral Dilemma: Approaches For Solving Ethical Dilemmas”. The event featured Dr. Johanes Haryatmoko, SJ., a social ethics expert, as the keynote speaker, with Prof. Syafaatun Almirzanah, M.A., M.Th., Ph.D., D.Min. serving as the moderator.

This webinar explored ethical approaches to addressing moral dilemmas, particularly in the healthcare field, using principles such as deontology, utilitarianism, proportionalism, and communitarianism. The discussion emphasized the importance of deep reflection in making ethical and fair decisions, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 on Good Health and Well-Being, and SDG 16 on Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.


Dr. Haryatmoko highlighted that “what is legal is not necessarily moral.” Ethical decisions, especially in the medical field, cannot be based solely on formal law but must also involve a deep analysis of social and cultural contexts. One example discussed was the case of a mother who refused an abortion despite significant pressure from her family. Dr. Haryatmoko emphasized the importance of respecting individual autonomy while considering collective values.

Prof. Syafaatun added that often, moral dilemmas arise from a lack of effective communication. “Before an issue becomes an ethical dilemma, the main problem is often poor communication,” she stated. She stressed the need for open and inclusive dialogue between healthcare providers and patients, which is in line with the SDGs’ efforts to promote peace and justice through effective communication.

The discussion also touched on ethical dilemmas in medical practice in Indonesia, such as preeclampsia procedures, abortion, and vasectomy, which often conflict with religious values. The webinar stressed the importance of adopting locally grounded ethical approaches to formulating humane solutions, in line with global efforts to ensure equitable and dignified healthcare access.

In conclusion, Dr. Haryatmoko reminded the participants that open discourse and deep reflection are key to navigating moral dilemmas. “Social ethics requires a bridge in the form of values and competencies to connect vision with action,” he stated.

The webinar was attended by participants from various sectors, including healthcare professionals, academics, and students, who actively asked questions regarding ethical dilemmas in medical practice. Dr. Haryatmoko’s book, which delves further into social ethics, also garnered significant attention from attendees.

 

For more information, please visit the official of CBMH UGM

E-mail             : cbmhfkugm@ugm.ac.id

Youtube          : CBMH UGM

Instagram        : cbmh_ugm

 

Reporter          : Rafi Khairuna Wibisono, S.Kom.

Editor              : Alvira Rahmasari, S.H.G.

The Asia-Pacific Regional Stakeholder Consultation on The First Draft of UNESCO Recommendation on The Ethics of Neurotechnology

UNESCO Chair on Bioethics Universitas Gadjah Mada (UCB UGM), in collaboration with the UNESCO Jakarta office, had successfully held an Asia-Pacific Regional Consultation to discuss the draft UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology. The event took place on June 21st 2024, virtually via Zoom Meeting platform. This consultation session was part of the process to develop the timely standard-setting instrument, UNESCO
recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology. The 1st draft text of the recommendation had been produced by UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group (AHEG), through its 1st meeting earlier this year on 22nd – 26th April. This activity was in alignment and contributing to the realization of Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 3 in ensuring healthy life and promote wellbeing for all at all age, SDG 10 in reducing inequality within and among countries and SDG 17 in strengthening implementation measures and revitalizing the global partnership for sustainable development.

This regional consultation was commenced with opening remarks from The Dean of Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing (FMPHN) UGM, Dr. Yodi Mahendradhata, M.Sc, Ph.D, FRSPH, and the Director of Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH), Dr. Dra. Retna Siwi Padmawati, MA, who also represented Prof. Dr. Yati Soenarto S, Sp.A (K)., Ph.D as the Chairholder of UNESCO Chair Bioethics UGM.

The UNESCO resource persons and also members of UNESCO AHEG attended this consultation session to provide background context and highlights for the draft recommendation text, as well as discussing interactively with participants. Dr. Dafna Feinholz Klip, as Chief of the Bioethics and Ethics of Science Section, within UNESCO’s Social and Human Science Sector, conveyed the process of preparing UNESCO’s draft recommendations on the Ethics of Neurotechnology. Dr. Ryota Kanai, experienced expert in neuroscience and member of UNESCO AHEG spoke on highlights of “Setting the scene: Neuroscience in the context of the draft UNESCO Recommendation”. Prof. Qingming Luo, experienced expert in neuroimaging and UNESCO AHEG member emphasized on the importance of integrating ethical frameworks into neurotechnology practice, and the role of international collaboration. The consultation session were led by two moderators dr. Rusdy Ghazali Malueka, Ph.D, Sp.S(K), expert neurologist, and dr. Wika Hartanti, MIH, bioethics faculty and executive manager of UCB UGM, both also teaching faculty at Master Bioethics UGM.

The event was attended by 58 invited participants who originated from 14 countries in Asia-Pacific region, and represented various stakeholders concerning neurotechnology development and implementation. Participants were from various backgrounds representing scientific community, healthcare providers, bioethicists, patient groups, and civil society. The interactive and lively consultation session facilitated participants’ inquiries and
feedbacks from various perspectives to improve the draft recommendation text. The discussion highlights important aspects about definition and scope of neurotechnology, and ethical concerns arising from it. Suggestions regarding values, principles and policy recommendations were made to encourage ethical, humane and sustainable development and practice of neurotechnology. Feedbacks and suggestions from this consultation session were documented, and reported back to UNESCO as representation of stakeholders’ perspectives from Asia – Pacific Region. Further details and information regarding subsequent process towards the final recommendation for Ethics in Neurotechnology is available in the UNESCO page (https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech/expert-group?hub=83294#).

Keywords: Bioethics, Ethics, Neuroethics, Neurotechnology, Neuroscience, UNESCO, SDGs, SDGs 3, SDGs 10, SDGs 17.